R9 270x benchmarks

can not take part now..

R9 270x benchmarks

We not only found ourselves impressed with what the R9 X 3GB brought to the table, but also extremely impressed with what Sapphire did with the TOXIC variation, one we hadn't seen pop up in a while.

r9 270x benchmarks

The R9 X 2GB has already done a great job of showing us what it's capable of and we're looking forward to see what happens when Sapphire put the magic TOXIC touch on the model today. We saw the cooler do an excellent job on the higher-end model, so it will be interesting to see the kind of numbers we get here today on a model that isn't quite as powerful and a bit cheaper.

Turning the card over, you can see we have a similar setup with the backplate.

Latex simple header

Having less memory, though, you can see it doesn't look quite as impressive, as it lacks the little heat sinks we saw on the X 3GB. We again see just how large the cooler is as it overshoots the card, and we also get an idea of the heat pipe setup.

Taking a spin around, you can see that power comes in the form of two 6-pin PCIe power connectors.

GeForce GTX 660 vs Radeon R9 270X

This is the same power setup as the reference R9 X 2GB. What does differ, though, is that moving to the front, we have two CrossFire connectors that give us the ability to run up to three of these cards together in CrossFireX mode, instead of just two.

Unfortunately it's not a feature that we'll be making use of today, but we will look into it as soon as we can. You can also see a vent that allows hot air to escape out the back of your case.

Looking below, you can see that they've pushed the core up to MHz, which is a MHz overclock from the default MHz clock speed that we see on the reference card.

This is a nice overclock and should bring with it a nice performance boost over the reference card. It's nice to see the memory overclocked from the factory, as it's something we don't often see. We would like to thank the following companies for supplying and supporting us with our test system hardware and equipment: IntelASUS and Corsair.

When we benchmark our video cards and look at the graphs, we aim to get to a certain level of FPS which we consider playable. There are three numbers we're looking out for when it comes to our benchmarks. If you're not dropping below 30 FPS during games, you're going to have a nice and smooth gaming experience. The ideal situation is that even in a heavy fire fight, the minimum stays above 30 FPS making sure that you can continue to aim easily or turn the corner with no dramas. If we're getting an average of 60 FPS, we should have a minimum of 30 FPS or better and as mentioned above, it means we've got some smooth game play happening.

If you're the owner of a Hz monitor, to get the most out of it you want to get around the FPS mark.

Max camera distance wow classic addon

Of course, if you're buying a Hz monitor to take advantage of 3D, an average of FPS in our benchmark means that in 3D you will have an average of 60 FPS, which again means you should expect some smooth gameplay.

Adding new game benchmarks is a long, tedious and time consuming task as every video card has to be re-tested in those new benchmarks.

Because of that reason we have always just evaluated our benchmark line up every six months.

Bharat me sabse jyada haldi

To stay up to date and current with the latest benchmarks and games available, we've changed our approach to adding new benchmarks. Our benchmark line up will progress and be updated as newer more intensive games with benchmarks comes to light. While this will mean that initially you may only see a single video card in those particular graphs, as the weeks go on and we test more and more video cards, the results will grow quickly. This will help keep our benchmark line up as up to date as possible as we introduce and remove games on a constant basis.

Buy It Here. Designed to measure your PC's gaming performance 3DMark 11 makes extensive use of all the new features in DirectX 11 including tessellation, compute shaders and multi-threading. Trusted by gamers worldwide to give accurate and unbiased results, 3DMark 11 is the best way to consistently and reliably test DirectX 11 under game-like loads.

r9 270x benchmarks

Starting off with 3DMark 11, we can see a bit of a boost in performance at both presets that give us a bit more breathing room over the MSI Twin Frozr Gaming OC version we looked at the other day, and of course, even more room over the reference clocked card.

It is our most ambitious and technical benchmark ever, featuring real-time graphics rendered with detail and complexity far beyond what is found in other benchmarks and games today. Fire Strike will only be available in the Windows editions of 3DMark initially.

Moving into Fire Strike, you can see a boost in performance when compared to the other R9 X offerings. You can see at the Standard preset we break over 6, points and we're just a few points away from 3, at the Extreme preset. New benchmark grants the power to unleash the DirectX 11 potential in the gift wrapping of impressively towering graphics capabilities.

It reveals the enchanting magic of floating islands with a tiny village hidden in the cloudy skies.The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 30, GPUs tested. Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components.

You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

AMD Radeon R9 270X and R7 260X Review

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Considering how cheap it is its a semi-decent card for a budget gamer. Still going strong medium to high on current intensive games.

DirectX 12 and Vulkan are supported. Great card for esports, 4gb variant is even better, can get over 60fps on average, pull the trigger if you find a used one for under 70 usd. Beast card. There are deffinitely better choices as ofbut even now, it delivers a good experience on moderate graphic settings. See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Save as guest. Based on 60, user benchmarks. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list. Strengths Avg. Locally-deformable PRT Bat fps. NBody particle system Galaxy fps.

This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 X performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions. Weaknesses Avg. High dynamic range lighting Teapot Parallax occlusion mapping Stones fps. Average Bench Based on 60, samples. GBR-User, 2 hrs ago.

r9 270x benchmarks

R9 X. GBR-User, 1 hr ago. UKR-User, 20 mins ago. Asus We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

Save as guest. Effective Speed. Real World Speed. Benchmark your GPU here. Average Score. Lighting Avg. Render target array GShader Sphere fps Hugely faster multi rendering. Overclocked Score.

Game FPS. CSGO Avg. Market Share. See market share leaders. Nice To Haves.

Partner Cards: 10 Radeon R9 270 And 270X Boards, Reviewed

High dynamic range lighting Teapot fps Much better reflection handling. Parallax occlusion mapping Stones fps Hugely better texture detail. Force Splatted Flocking Swarm fps Hugely faster complex splatting. User Builds. Systems with these GPUs. Asus M5A97 R2. Group Test Results Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.It comes equipped with shaders and exposes an aggregate bit memory interface.

Only the core and memory clock rates differ even compared to the older Pitcairn-based Radeon HD To boost, or not to boost, that is the question. Does a high specified clock rate mean anything if a card can't maintain it under load, and is forced to throttle back? We took all ten cards, warmed them up through a real-world graphics load, and then started recording their clock rates during an exhaustive gaming loop. Topics AMD. See all comments Boost clocks are the luck of the draw; maybe it's time for mainstream liquid-cooled graphics cards, since we are reaching the limits of air cooling.

Do you agree? Conclusion by me, cause Tom hardware missed it :MSI Twin Frozer cooler is a beast that covers all the major points, it keeps cool and quiet, and not that large, it would fit in normal cases. No concluding remarks or did I miss something? So sad for getting my first asus product. It could be nice to have benchmarks for consistency as well like we used to for the older articles like this one.

I'd love to see a roundup comparing models across the board and see if there is a general trend. Thanks for the roundup - real useful info here - and no conclusion or awards necessary - you're simply giving us some good information to make a buying decision, and I like that.

When it's not used for gaming, it is scrypt mining for a little extra cash for the boys. Those noise comparison videos! I am very surprised at the Gigabyte Tricool thing, they were extremely quiet in a demo rig full load in a shop near me.Topics AMD. See all comments Boost clocks are the luck of the draw; maybe it's time for mainstream liquid-cooled graphics cards, since we are reaching the limits of air cooling.

Do you agree? Conclusion by me, cause Tom hardware missed it :MSI Twin Frozer cooler is a beast that covers all the major points, it keeps cool and quiet, and not that large, it would fit in normal cases. No concluding remarks or did I miss something? So sad for getting my first asus product. It could be nice to have benchmarks for consistency as well like we used to for the older articles like this one.

I'd love to see a roundup comparing models across the board and see if there is a general trend. Thanks for the roundup - real useful info here - and no conclusion or awards necessary - you're simply giving us some good information to make a buying decision, and I like that. When it's not used for gaming, it is scrypt mining for a little extra cash for the boys.

Those noise comparison videos! I am very surprised at the Gigabyte Tricool thing, they were extremely quiet in a demo rig full load in a shop near me.Recently if feels like in my own personal categories the focus has been on the higher-end segment of hardware.

Chhu luk rawn

As much as we love those super-fast and super-expensive pieces of hardware, there's no denying that they continue to be out of reach for a lot of people. Today we move back to the middle of the video card pack to see what's going on with one of AMD's mid-range video cards. It's been a while since we've looked at the model, and we're looking forward to seeing just what's going on with the model in more ways than one. It will be interesting to see how the model compares to the original reference video card we looked at with its launch driver.

We've also expanded our benchmark line up since the launch and it will be great to see what's going on with the mid-range model in some of the more recent releases. We've looked at a couple of IceQ X2 cards from HIS and been impressed with them, albeit the particular ones we've been looking at have sat at the top of the pyramid.

Taking a look at the package, you can see the overall design is very typical. We've got that IceQ X2 design with the series mentioned in the middle. Diving inside the package, it's pretty standard. We haven't got much, but to be completely honest, you will most likely not use any of it either way, as you should grab the latest driver from the AMD website and VGA monitors are hardly common these days.

The prices listed are valid at the time of writing but can change at any time. Click the link to see the very latest pricing for the best deal. Taking the card out of the box and seeing it for the first time, you can see the overall design isn't anything out of the ordinary. We've seen the IceQ X2 cooler a number of times before, and not being an iPower model means that it comes with the black shroud instead of the gold one.

We've got a dual fan setup and a massive heat sink behind them with some copper heat pipes designed to pull the heat away from the GPU. This is a big cooler for a mid-range video card. It's handled the higher-end models well, so I must admit I'm looking forward to seeing just what it's capable of on this mid-range model.

Moving away from the front of the card and checking out the top, you can see the standard dual 6-pin PCIe power connector setup at the back of the card. Looking here, you can also see one of the heat pipes that comes out from the center of the heat sink. Staying across the top but moving to the front of the card, you can see we've got a single CrossFire connector that gives us the ability to run two of these cards together.

As someone who uses DisplayPort monitors exclusively, this is a much better option for me as I could use two DisplayPort monitors and a Dual-Link DVI connector to drive three x monitors - from a productivity standpoint this is great.

The inclusion of a Mini-DP to DisplayPort connector would've been nice, though, with a setup like this. Taking a look at the model name, you can guess that the model comes overclocked thanks to the "Turbo" branding.

While we would've liked to have seen HIS bump up the memory clock, we can't deny the fact that most companies choose to concentrate just on bumping the core clock, as it yields the largest performance gains. We would like to thank the following companies for supplying and supporting us with our test system hardware and equipment: IntelASUS and Corsair.

We've got a bunch of cards in our graphs here today. Saying that, though, because of the recent benchmarks we've added and the time between testing mid-range cards, a lot of the lineup does sit higher than the HIS R9 X IceQ X2 Turbo Boost 2GB, which is of course the first card included today.

Sitting with that we're also going to be looking at the reference R9 X 2GB, which we used at launch. When we benchmark our video cards and look at the graphs, we aim to get to a certain level of FPS which we consider playable.

There are three numbers we're looking out for when it comes to our benchmarks. If you're not dropping below 30 FPS during games, you're going to have a nice and smooth gaming experience. The ideal situation is that even in a heavy fire fight, the minimum stays above 30 FPS making sure that you can continue to aim easily or turn the corner with no dramas.

If we're getting an average of 60 FPS, we should have a minimum of 30 FPS or better and as mentioned above, it means we've got some smooth game play happening. If you're the owner of a Hz monitor, to get the most out of it you want to get around the FPS mark.Out of the box the reference XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG.

After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable hair dryer levels of noise. The reference XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games.

Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible results here.

AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool.

Hemorrhoid surgery recovery time forum

UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades. Save as guest.

Effective Speed. Real World Speed. Benchmark your GPU here. Average Score. Lighting Avg. Render target array GShader Sphere fps Hugely faster multi rendering. Overclocked Score. Game FPS. CSGO Avg. Market Share. See market share leaders. Nice To Haves. Age Newest 12 Months Hugely more recent. High dynamic range lighting Teapot fps Hugely better reflection handling. Parallax occlusion mapping Stones fps Hugely better texture detail.

Force Splatted Flocking Swarm fps Hugely faster complex splatting. User Builds. Systems with these GPUs. Asus M5A97 R2. Group Test Results Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison. Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.


Tujind

thoughts on “R9 270x benchmarks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top